Originally Posted by Cowoline
Okay, so I am trying to see if we can get some attention brought to this in a more healthy way, but I can't do it without your support <3

https://forums.larian.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=907260#Post907260

https://www.reddit.com/r/BaldursGate3/comments/16yv2g9/the_halsin_compromise/

It's not a compromise for a monogram Tav, it's still your polygamous games. Still not too tasty-smelling bone from your lunch.

Originally Posted by Icelyn
For Halsin’s introduction, it probably depends on when you first played the game. If you played EA, he was introduced as a serious and kind character, who to me could help fill a lack of good companions (during EA, they said they only added the evil and neutral companions). If your first intro to Halsin was the bear sex scene, I guess his intro would be as a joke character.

Exactly. When I spent hundreds of hours in the first actEA falling in love with a character, happy to find out that there will be romance in the game with him. And get the result that romance is not for me, romance is for those who even did not know the name of the character before the bear video. And then they try to convince us that it's just that we saw everything wrong.
To be honest, reading the cries about "oppressed" minorities here, I do not believe that something will be fixed for us.
In games are no longer cute comfortable romance. They are now used to represent the most exotic types of relationship