Originally Posted by Silver/
If anything interesting comes out of this evening, it's that I've rarely met anyone so full of themselves. You can taste the salt.
You gave an ultimatum that can't be argued against. The author has the final say on what happens. You are completely correct on that. That doesn't mean that he can't be wrong, but you act like he can't.

I've seen many a game or series die because the authors (read: developers, screenwriters) thought they couldn't do wrong. Just look at the Witcher's netflix series. I'm not saying BG3 will die from this simple situation, of course, don't get me wrong. It won't even harm their reputation in the slightest, I'm just proving my point that if something like this - the exact same issue - happened on a larger scale, it would.

Either way, since you won't change your stance that the author can't do wrong, what's the point of arguing? You have one opinion. That opinion is, unfortunately, a flawed fact, and the only counter argument is wallets. One that I doubt anyone is planning to use. We are just here to talk about how the situation could be better, according to us. The final say will, indeed, remain with the author. No point telling us that. We know.

Last edited by Michieltjuhh; 06/10/23 12:06 AM.