Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 45 of 93 1 2 43 44 45 46 47 92 93
Joined: Jan 2023
S
old hand
Offline
old hand
S
Joined: Jan 2023
Originally Posted by Illiti
Originally Posted by Silver/
I don't think it's a strong argument for us to tell the writer his characters are not ... in character. I'm not bothered by someone like SH making an exception for someone she finds personally attractive.

If (considerable *if*) Astarion's romance isn't meant to be uncomfortable when combined with Halsin's, that could use work. The romance triggers altogether can use work. Even a simple combined fix of better epilogues and getting to go with Halsin would improve the experience a lot. This is about as far as I can stretch my expectations, along with maybe a few more scenes.

Please, in first 2 acts Shadowheart states that she doesn't want to share Tav, and even breaks relationship if you even kiss another character, sudenly in act 3 she is open to sharing and orgies with Halsin, please tell me how is it good writing.

Also they chose 2 most (emotionally) broken characters in the camp, so Halsin can have sex with somebody else beside Tav, i would assume after everything that happens to Astarion and Shadowheart they would need stable relationship, but no apparently they need orgies to heal.

Also this:

Originally Posted by Backinstyle
Shadowheart gets annoyed when you invite Halsin to camp after finishing the shadow curse quest. She says something about him taking up too much space and sounds more than annoyed. And if you bring him into the gauntlet of Shar they get into a spat. So no she doesn't like him and that's not going to suddenly change 3 days later.
I'm not convinced you're reading what anyone says and not just ranting at random people.

Joined: Sep 2023
P
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
P
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by Silver/
Originally Posted by Backinstyle
She never shows any interest in Halsin ever the whole first 2 acts and he's in your camp for most of it. She makes no comments about his looks or anything.

In act 2, she does however roll her eyes, looking annoyed, say he's taking up too much space in camp. And then there's all of the nasty stuff she says to him in gauntlet of shar.

Her suddenly showing attraction to him in act 3 is convenient for his sudden poly preference.
Yet, is it out of character for SH to consider such a relationship?
Yes. Everything about her romance points to her wanting you and only you.

What about this entire conversation makes you think she wants a polyamorous relationship?
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Or when she tells you with a smile about telling bedtime tales to future children?
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Or her father telling you your relationship reminds him of him and her mother when they first met? Who by all accounts are monogamous together.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I could post more examples but you get the point.
Yes I know, Halsin thread but Halsin is the reason her romance has been ruined for so many people with this god awful bait and switch only because they share the same author. You cannot convince me her willingness to open up the relationship for ONLY him is not just some degenerate fantasy this author wanted to put in the game for himself with this self-insert.

Joined: Oct 2023
I
apprentice
Offline
apprentice
I
Joined: Oct 2023
Originally Posted by Silver/
Originally Posted by Illiti
Originally Posted by Silver/
I don't think it's a strong argument for us to tell the writer his characters are not ... in character. I'm not bothered by someone like SH making an exception for someone she finds personally attractive.

If (considerable *if*) Astarion's romance isn't meant to be uncomfortable when combined with Halsin's, that could use work. The romance triggers altogether can use work. Even a simple combined fix of better epilogues and getting to go with Halsin would improve the experience a lot. This is about as far as I can stretch my expectations, along with maybe a few more scenes.

Please, in first 2 acts Shadowheart states that she doesn't want to share Tav, and even breaks relationship if you even kiss another character, sudenly in act 3 she is open to sharing and orgies with Halsin, please tell me how is it good writing.

Also they chose 2 most (emotionally) broken characters in the camp, so Halsin can have sex with somebody else beside Tav, i would assume after everything that happens to Astarion and Shadowheart they would need stable relationship, but no apparently they need orgies to heal.

Also this:

Originally Posted by Backinstyle
Shadowheart gets annoyed when you invite Halsin to camp after finishing the shadow curse quest. She says something about him taking up too much space and sounds more than annoyed. And if you bring him into the gauntlet of Shar they get into a spat. So no she doesn't like him and that's not going to suddenly change 3 days later.
I'm not convinced you're reading what anyone says and not just ranting at random people.
Sorry, you wrote "I don't think it's a strong argument for us to tell the writer his characters are not ... in character. I'm not bothered by someone like SH making an exception for someone she finds personally attractive."

So i am giving you some examples how out of character they act.

Last edited by Illiti; 05/10/23 11:27 PM.
Joined: Oct 2023
B
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
B
Joined: Oct 2023
No, they're not wrong. Given SH and Astarions situations it makes sense they would be in a very vulnerable state. Stability tends to be the best medicine during times like that, not orgies.

Joined: Sep 2023
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by Silver/
Oh, it is convenient. It is even poorly written. Yet, is it out of character for SH to consider such a relationship? That is unknowable. The author will always have the last word.
It is not unknowable, though, because it is not the first time the conversation happens.

You can have this exact conversation regarding EVERY other companion in act 2. Shadowheart shows she is attracted to Karlach throughout the entirety of the game up to that point. Karlach is the perfect partner for a poly relationship since she's a ticking time bomb and thus won't possibly be harm to a lasting relationship because unless she's fixed there couldn't be one. Yet, she doesn't want it with Karlach. Or any of the other 4, for that matter.

There is absolutely no reason for her to do a 180 with Halsin then, who she has shown no prior interest in, while knowing that she has also, on at least 5 occasions, shown no interest in a poly relationship. And this is all in mind that she also has not actually had sex with the PC, which makes her willingness to share something she hasn't even had yet even less likely. The drow twins - as much as I dislike that interaction too - proves this as well. She is not willing to share you there, not until your first time.

So she has had 5 occasions to accept poly before, one of which was with someone she's shown to be attracted to and is technically the perfect poly partner, and she had 1 occasion of sharing you sexually and denied it. Insert Halsin, who's only character defining trait in act 3 is someone who wants to have a poly relationship with you and your partner, and all of those points are suddenly moot.

And that's ignoring the fact that throughout act 1 and act 2 she was significantly more confident than she is by the time you get to act 3.

So no, again, it's not unknowable. It's very knowable.

Last edited by Michieltjuhh; 05/10/23 11:28 PM.
Joined: Jan 2023
S
old hand
Offline
old hand
S
Joined: Jan 2023
Originally Posted by portionbeans
Originally Posted by Silver/
Originally Posted by Backinstyle
She never shows any interest in Halsin ever the whole first 2 acts and he's in your camp for most of it. She makes no comments about his looks or anything.

In act 2, she does however roll her eyes, looking annoyed, say he's taking up too much space in camp. And then there's all of the nasty stuff she says to him in gauntlet of shar.

Her suddenly showing attraction to him in act 3 is convenient for his sudden poly preference.
Yet, is it out of character for SH to consider such a relationship?
Yes. Everything about her romance points to her wanting you and only you.

What about this entire conversation makes you think she wants a polyamorous relationship?
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Or when she tells you with a smile about telling bedtime tales to future children?
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Or her father telling you your relationship reminds him of him and her mother when they first met? Who by all accounts are monogamous together.
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I could post more examples but you get the point.
Yes I know, Halsin thread but Halsin is the reason her romance has been ruined for so many people with this god awful bait and switch only because they share the same author. You cannot convince me her willingness to open up the relationship for ONLY him is not just some degenerate fantasy this author wanted to put in the game for himself with this self-insert.
It's a matter of fundamental understanding. If the writer decides SH will only wear green from now on, for literally no reason? Not out of character. If he decides she's aromantic? Not out of character. There is absolutely nothing that can be out of character. The closest concept available is "inconsistency". Even then, inconsistency requires a second person when unintentional. Someone to interpret the character, and create a derivative in their mind through it. The character in the author's mind is always the original and is hence not capable of OOC. It's a concept you find relevant in fanwork and fanfiction. Not overly complex.

Similarly, there is always one antifan about to die mad when they think the author "committed OOC". It's a one way road to madness. I'm not going there. You're invited to rage at the author, but I get flashbacks to levels of cringe otherwise unimaginable. No thank you

Joined: Sep 2023
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by portionbeans
Or when she tells you with a smile about telling bedtime tales to future children?
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Very offtopic but when the hell does she ever talk about the bedtime tale for children? Never seen that dialogue.

Joined: Sep 2023
P
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
P
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by Michieltjuhh
Originally Posted by portionbeans
Or when she tells you with a smile about telling bedtime tales to future children?
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Very offtopic but when the hell does she ever talk about the bedtime tale for children? Never seen that dialogue.
At the start of the game you have a dialogue option that says "What do you think of all that's happened to us so far?" which then opens up to more questions. The problem is the first time you ask this it turns in "I want to talk to you about all that's happened to us so far" and you never get to ask her that again and has less options and you can only ask her how you're holding up to her estimations. If you go the entire game while not asking her "What do you think of all that's happened to us so far?" she'll say that some time into act 3 when you finally do ask her.
Probably a bug or something.

Last edited by portionbeans; 05/10/23 11:36 PM.
Joined: Oct 2023
B
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
B
Joined: Oct 2023
Taken from google about characters acting out of character.

[When a character acts out of character, what this really means is that the writer has failed to sustain the causal believability of his character's actions. And the result? Readers become distanced from the character, and their suspension of disbelief is, at best, endangered.]

This is what we mean when we say out of character. His writing is unbelievable in act 3 regarding SH and Halsin.

Joined: Sep 2023
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by Silver/
It's a matter of fundamental understanding. If the writer decides SH will only wear green from now on, for literally no reason? Not out of character. If he decides she's aromantic? Not out of character. There is absolutely nothing that can be out of character. The closest concept available is "inconsistency". Even then, inconsistency requires a second person when unintentional. Someone to interpret the character, and create a derivative in their mind through it. The character in the author's mind is always the original and is hence not capable of OOC. It's a concept you find relevant in fanwork and fanfiction. Not overly complex.

Similarly, there is always one antifan about to die mad when they think the author "committed OOC". It's a one way road to madness. I'm not going there. You're invited to rage at the author, but I get flashbacks to levels of cringe otherwise unimaginable. No thank you
So the TL:DR is that the author can do no wrong. Thank you for your contribution. You are dismissed. Because there's no arguing against that. It's just wrong. It's the same as saying that class balance in a game is fine when one character does 1 damage and the other 2 and they have no other interactions, just because that's how it's made.

Last edited by Michieltjuhh; 05/10/23 11:39 PM.
Joined: Oct 2023
member
Offline
member
Joined: Oct 2023
I'm back in there for a moment, I think it's funny. I don't think the author will change anything, Isn't he even the main author?
So he knows about everything and wanted to see SH and Halsin together in Act 3 at the latest, when Halsin becomes a romance.
The author seems to want this SH thing...

Joined: Sep 2023
P
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
P
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by EdaLee
I'm back in there for a moment, I think it's funny. I don't think the author will change anything, Isn't he even the main author?
So he knows about everything and wanted to see SH and Halsin together in Act 3 at the latest, when Halsin becomes a romance.
The author seems to want this SH thing...
Oh I agree I don't think he'll change it either. Anybody with a brain can put two and two together and see that this only exists in the game because he wrote both of them and Halsin is the most blatant self-insert for an author in the history of fiction.

Joined: Jan 2023
S
old hand
Offline
old hand
S
Joined: Jan 2023
Originally Posted by Backinstyle
Taken from google about characters acting out of character.

[When a character acts out of character, what this really means is that the writer has failed to sustain the causal believability of his character's actions. And the result? Readers become distanced from the character, and their suspension of disbelief is, at best, endangered.]

This is what we mean when we say out of character. His writing is unbelievable in act 3 regarding SH and Halsin.
Cherry picked and informal definition. Because characters evolve, it is impossible to tell how their opinions may or may not change. The author will always set the limit. You're free to use it in any way you like, of course. "Writer does not understand their own character" is unfortunately the default and I have had enough of it.

Joined: Sep 2023
P
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
P
Joined: Sep 2023
I don't know who's worse, Seho or Silver/.
Both are like arguing with a brick wall who have in their mind that Larian and the writers are god's gift to video games and can do no wrong.

Joined: Jan 2023
S
old hand
Offline
old hand
S
Joined: Jan 2023
Originally Posted by Michieltjuhh
Originally Posted by Silver/
It's a matter of fundamental understanding. If the writer decides SH will only wear green from now on, for literally no reason? Not out of character. If he decides she's aromantic? Not out of character. There is absolutely nothing that can be out of character. The closest concept available is "inconsistency". Even then, inconsistency requires a second person when unintentional. Someone to interpret the character, and create a derivative in their mind through it. The character in the author's mind is always the original and is hence not capable of OOC. It's a concept you find relevant in fanwork and fanfiction. Not overly complex.

Similarly, there is always one antifan about to die mad when they think the author "committed OOC". It's a one way road to madness. I'm not going there. You're invited to rage at the author, but I get flashbacks to levels of cringe otherwise unimaginable. No thank you
So the TL:DR is that the author can do no wrong. Thank you for your contribution. You are dismissed. Because there's no arguing against that. It's just wrong. It's the same as saying that class balance in a game is fine when one character does 1 damage and the other 2 and they have no other interactions, just because that's how it's made.
If anything interesting comes out of this evening, it's that I've rarely met anyone so full of themselves. You can taste the salt.

Joined: Jan 2023
S
old hand
Offline
old hand
S
Joined: Jan 2023
Originally Posted by portionbeans
I don't know who's worse, Seho or Silver/.
Both are like arguing with a brick wall who have in their mind that Larian and the writers are god's gift to video games and can do no wrong.
This was hilarious, considering the beginning of this thread and my general complaints. Thank you

Joined: Sep 2023
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Sep 2023
Originally Posted by Silver/
If anything interesting comes out of this evening, it's that I've rarely met anyone so full of themselves. You can taste the salt.
You gave an ultimatum that can't be argued against. The author has the final say on what happens. You are completely correct on that. That doesn't mean that he can't be wrong, but you act like he can't.

I've seen many a game or series die because the authors (read: developers, screenwriters) thought they couldn't do wrong. Just look at the Witcher's netflix series. I'm not saying BG3 will die from this simple situation, of course, don't get me wrong. It won't even harm their reputation in the slightest, I'm just proving my point that if something like this - the exact same issue - happened on a larger scale, it would.

Either way, since you won't change your stance that the author can't do wrong, what's the point of arguing? You have one opinion. That opinion is, unfortunately, a flawed fact, and the only counter argument is wallets. One that I doubt anyone is planning to use. We are just here to talk about how the situation could be better, according to us. The final say will, indeed, remain with the author. No point telling us that. We know.

Last edited by Michieltjuhh; 06/10/23 12:06 AM.
Joined: Nov 2020
Location: Silverymoon
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2020
Location: Silverymoon
Folks, if you think someone is a troll, or that arguing with them is pointless, please just block them and move on. We've already had enough moderator warnings in this thread.

Joined: Oct 2023
B
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
B
Joined: Oct 2023
Yes they do evolve, gradually. There has to be something that is noted in previous actions/interactions to properly pull off such a drastic change for the audience to maintain its believability.

The author could get away with anything if you use "characters evolve" as an excuse. I mean what if SH stated acting and talking like Karlach for no reason? Oh I guess she's just evolved lol Make it make sense dude.

Joined: Oct 2023
member
Offline
member
Joined: Oct 2023
Why shouldn't we also talk about SH or Astarion, the matter has to do with poly and Halsin.

Page 45 of 93 1 2 43 44 45 46 47 92 93

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5