Originally Posted by fylimar
I do understand, that you are mad about Viconia and Sarevok, but both are still different cases from Karlach. Kalrach was always good, Viconia and Sarevok not. You could maybe compare it with Astarion, who starts pretty evil, but can become better during the game depending on how you progress his story.
Do you understand what a "character" is or do you consider that there is only "this guy was good" and "this guy was evil" ? It's not about their alignement, it's about their CHARACTER.
The problem with Viconia and Sarevok is not that "they are evil in BG3" (both COULD end evil in ToB so it's not a stretch).
The problem is "they don't act at all and they don't have the same character than their entire definition in the BG saga, wether before their met the MC, during or after".
What is so hard to understand ?

Last edited by Akka; 07/10/23 06:51 AM.