To me is still very off/wrong how many reviewers in YouTube etc. claimed that they played the game, and they did not mention (so many of them), how lacking was the ending of the game. You can not review something like Game of Thrones, and then say, "well only the ending was bad", to me it is clear in BG3, that the problems in the plot happened earlier and the freedom of choice was slowly taken away after Act 1... so quality drop of the game started much earlier than Act 3. But sure, even with the ending, the lacking of epilogue and other problems of the game, BG3 is not 1/10 or 4/10, it is better than that, but not 9/10 or 10/10, those numbers seems to me the hype around this game, not reality of its curent state.
