Sorry Paladin, but this will also be the last time I reply to you. It's common for people to have different opinions, however in this case, I don't think both sides' opinions are equally valid, which was just proved by Blackheifer unfortunately. One side wants original, more complex characters, the other wants "cruel, selfish, racist, arrogant and a mass murderer". Though judging from the nothing burger arguments you made earlier, maybe you agree with them? That "Aerie is a childish whinny girl, Jaheira is a self-righteous harper and Sarevok is always a puppy dog."

Originally Posted by Dext. Paladin
OP confirmed that including the development in previous game to this game would be good but it wasn't their point, yet seems to be troubled when the development isn't fitting to what "Viconia" means to them

You seem to deliberately miss my points, so let me humor you once. OK, Viconia's romance/development never happened, what then? The 2 choices we have are 1. BG1 original Viconia who refused to kill a child 2. BG2 evil ending Viconia who rebelled against Shar then saved a city with Drizzt. Which one is same with the one we got in BG3?
And what exact development did we get? Can you tell the difference between development and sudden retcon?

Originally Posted by Dext. Paladin
If it up to me I will not remove Viconia, instead she should be able to join our camp or better yet, our party, in similar fashion of that Minsc and Jaheira. Only then the complain would be clear that it wasn't actually that Viconia is "badly written", it's "not written as I would like it".

I think we should be thankful that it's not up to you then. Imagine this, one day they make a GOT game but the campaign players get is from season 8. You think Daenerys fans will be happier if devs make the city burning lunatic a follower instead of a boss? Pure delusion, sorry to say. No thank you, we're good, get that woman out of our game please.