I'd strongly suggest you read the posts you're reacting against, Dex. Every time you reiterate that you haven't, you make yourself look more foolish - at least to me.
Yes, many things the OP mentioned are simple factual truths. I'd recommend you read the post properly, as it's very easy to sort the baseline truths from the personal opinions, if you read, rather than skim.
Here's one as an example:
...in act 1 some races are more equal than others with lots of effort having been spend on the exotics, drow and gith and less on the rest.
This is objectively true. There are more custom dialogues and more custom interactions and reactions for Drow and Gith than there are for elves or humans, or any other race in Act 1. This is not opinion - it's just an empirical detail about the game. Notice I'm making no statement of opinion or judgement about what this means, what I think about it, or whether it's good or bad - it's just a piece of factual information.
Here's one that is NOT a statement of a fact, but rather personal opinion:
The longer I think about it the less impressed I am with BG3.
To make it short, in my eyes BG3 is fake. A poser that distracts with superficious things from a thouroghly mediocre core.
This is clearly a personal opinion, and a subjective impression, voiced by the poster as their personal take - it's not posed as being an objective truth or an empirical fact, it's clearly their personal experience and opinion.
Their post contains both types of statements - factually based ones, and opinion-based ones. Writing the entire post off as attempting to blanket one or the other is disingenuous and is not an action taken in good faith or with a mind towards open discussion... it's just an attack.
I did not get the impression, at any point, as though the OP was trying to claim any kind of objective truth about the game's quality - those elements of their post were clearly based on personal opinion and experience, as they noted with their language.
You clearly
did feel strongly enough to jump up and attack the OP, and defend the game, rather than simply ignoring a review whose opinion you did not agree with - you are the one
pushing to deride, discredit and to make a fight out of someone posting their personal experiences and review.
I'd be curious to know what part of my own comment was me projecting something as an objective truth, which was my own personal opinion only; you say that I did, and I'd like to know where you saw that, especially since you say also that you didn't really read my post. If you've already decided what I'm saying without reading it, then we are not having a conversation, and you are just posting here to start conflict. Please don't do that.
