Wonder no more: the entirety of it. Why? Because you prove that simply presenting an argument is a projection of truth, to which I agree, thus making all of it as projection.
The reason is because the *not* a statement of fact become a vocal point of their argument.
Saying:
...in act 1 some races are more equal than others with lots of effort having been spend on the exotics, drow and gith and less on the rest.
is not wrong. But making it sole reason is incorrect. Considering the entirety of cRPG genre has never come close to achieving what BG3 has. So yes it's true but incorrect. And probably Pretentious.
Here is a challenge: Mention 1 cRPG (especially DnD-based cRPG) that has reactivity to your race better than BG3, I *will* prove you wrong.
The why I posted here to remind people that these are OP opinions, shouldn't be perceived as fact, because for some the language they're using is not clear enough and tend to be perceived as assertions of opinions as truth.
I think when you make a harsh critique, please make a comparison to what you think is better, The WoTR/KM comparison is decent, so we can understand how laughable/warped/understandable/closer to truth that opinion actually is. I mean comparing BG3 to DA is insult to BG3, compare it to WoTR/KM, PoEs or at least prior Infinity Engine games, but DA/Mass Effect, plain comical.
Last edited by Dext. Paladin; 12/10/23 05:04 AM.
