Originally Posted by DYNIA
Non existent rapiers ? wtf you talking about lol

you can get sword of scream and rapier +1 in act 1 and it outclass any crap light weapon

still str weapons with dual wielder is ridiculas with dmg and only weapon match thier power is sword of scream with +1 rapier offhand

KNIFE OF THE UNDERMOUNTAIN KING dmg 1-6+2 hahahahahah nice dmg
sword of life steal do bonus damage on crit, gl with that count how many crit you deal


meanwhile str weapon in act 2 exist
https://baldursgate3.wiki.fextralife.com/Myrkulite+Scourge

To be clear, you are claiming that when comparing this:
a +1 Rapier (1d8 + 1 average damage 5.5)
To this:
Knife of the Undermountain King (1d6 + 2, reroll all damage rolls of 2 or less with all weapons, average damage 6.17, makes all weapons crit on 19-20 instead of 20 base thus adding +1 crit range to all weapons, automatic advantage against all heavily or lightly obscured targets)
Not only is the +1 Rapier the better choice, but that it's *so much better* that it is worth using a feat to be able to use that +1 rapier instead?

And while the 2-9, average damage 5.5 Rapier is "ridiculas with dmg", the 3-8, average damage 6.17 Knife of the Undermountain King is laughable in how terrible its damage is?

And setting aside the damage amounts, you think that an effect that lets you reroll damage is worth a feat in and of itself, and is SS tier (savage attacker), but a weapon which gives you damage rerolls (and advantage and improved crit range and so forth) is a joke of a weapon, not worth using?

I just want to be clear on your position on this. I think it's obvious I would strongly disagree, and I think the reasons why are similarly obvious.