No, with 95% it would be 30 damage. Can you not even follow the scenario setup?
Average damage would be 30*.95 or 28.5, and over the course of 20 attacks you would deal 570 damage.
With the +100 damage ring, your average damage would be .9*130 or 117 damage. Across 20 attacks you would deal 2340 damage.
The fact that you think a +1 to hit ring is better there over +100 damage, *and* can’t even keep track of only 4 facts in play (your initial damage, initial accuracy, and what each of the rings do) means that frankly you’re not worth talking to.
I have trouble believing such a response is genuine, and whether it is it is not I consider a rudimentary understanding of math and logic a prerequisite for meaningful discourse. So someone who fundamentally lacks them or someone who pretends to, either way that isn’t someone In interested in conversing with. I’ll be ignoring your posts in the future, best of luck, you’ll need it.
