And the "she's not threatened anymore" is just 100% pulled out of thin air and is not even an argument. There's nothing that implies this. It is never mentioned. It's a pointless and baseless thing to assume.
I mean the line IS there and while you don't read it that way the line you just talked about is also there to support it for people who do read it as implication/foreshadowing similar to the bare skin in the brambles line I brought up a few days ago being readable as an implication of familiarity with casual flings. It's not baseless, it's just not how you read it and it's fine to read it either way. Because either way, the result is determined by player choice in the game.
