With the caveat that I'm new to the discussion and I've not read every post in this thread I'm inclined to agree with @Auric's post 100%

Quote
She does say "not tonight" to you asking to share.

Right. And there are layers of meaning to this conversation since, one the surface, you are talking about wine but you are really discussing the possibility of a relationship so "not tonight" is really about the bounds of the relationship. And a died in the wool monogamist would say something like "I think this bottle only has enough for two glasses"


But there are two problems with making the assumption that this is foreshadowing to her being open to share.
1. She only drinks wine with you and has a very romantic kiss with you that has her completely infatuated with you afterward. There is no sex sharing implied.

You are right that it's just . But but "no, not tonight" is not "no, not ever" and that's significant in the context of the conversation.


Quote
And the "she's not threatened anymore" is just 100% pulled out of thin air and is not even an argument. There's nothing that implies this. It is never mentioned. It's a pointless and baseless thing to assume.

Really? I think it's in the choice of partners - the sex workers are no threat her status as primary. Neither is Halsin who seem like something of a relationship anarchist.