SH is happy to explore in the context of the relationship but isn't interested in seeking out sex on her own. Once she has a secure base, once she feels love, she feels free to explore other feelings. Just like a dungeon delve - first secure a base camp and then go looking for adventure.
This conclusion comes from absolutely nothing more than your mind, and is instantly refuted because the only person she seems okay with to have such a relationship is with Halsin, while shutting down all 5 other companions in the exact same scenario, for absolutely no explained reason at all.
Originally Posted by Frog001
She says it's "Bold of you to ask" in responce to player suggesting it..
It is considered "Bold to ask" here because it completely and utterly ignores the fact that it has been asked 5 times prior already, where it was apparently not bold to ask. This means it ignored 5 counts of headcanon character progression. The very definition of an inconsistency.
Originally Posted by KillerRabbit
1. She didn't rule out sharing in the wine conversation. Just not tonight. And that was written almost 3 years in patch 1
and
Originally Posted by Auric
It isn't. Both are equally valid because both are a result of an individual's own thoughts on the matter. But a few people continue being vocal about how they want interactions that support a non-monogamous interpretation removed wholesale, while the people who interpret it that way are kinda just here to be like no reading it the other way is fine and valid please don't simply remove it entirely, it'd be cooler to improve on it.
Lets assume she indeed seemed more open to sharing in act 1 based on this conversation, because it's up to interpretation. You did not yet have an active romance with her at this point, so she is not in love with you yet, just attracted to you. Throughout act 1, she starts falling in love with you. Her character starts changing based on this. This changes entirely in act 2, where you get the opportunity to take the relationship to the next level. In act 2, the dialogue makes it clear she went through the needed character development that turns her into mono, because while during the act 1 dialogue she says "not tonight", in act 2 she will shut down any such attempt instead, because she's no longer just attracted to you but in love with you. After act 2, she is no longer open to sharing. You can't ignore character development, which is what you are doing.
If a character is written to slap people in act 1, and they lose their arm in act 2, you can't write that they slap people again in act 3 without explaining how they got their arm back, but instead with the argument that they did it in act 1. That's not how these things work, and that's exactly what happened here.
