Honestly the whole thing is seriously diluting the very definition of masterpiece.
I am perfectly okay loving to death a game because it's my shit, and I'm also okay with it getting a 6/10 score and would probably agree with it because it's also got huge flaws. I am also cognizant of flaws that may not bother me at all, but am empathetic enough to never dismiss it bothering others or to downplay it as 'not detracting from the experience.' For one, you haven't played it without that flaw, so how do you know it doesn't detract from the experience? It can be fun despite that flaw, but that's not the same thing as the flaw 'not counting'. It doesn't have to be 'perfect' but it also shouldn't be rife with issues, which BG3 IS and using lack of perfection as a defense is a Nirvana Fallacy.
