Originally Posted by Netav
My interpretation is also consistent without headcanon, even though some don't like it. The difference between our interpretations is you try to headcanon her act 2 poly proposal as wanting "nesting partner" or seeing "threat" in other companions to be not number 1, while I just consider Halsin as a fling(He even says that he doesn't like word "relationship" when you ask him about it).

That's right. We're all head cannoning here. smile I'm sincerely happy we came to an agreement. I can't get the party emoji to show up on this forum so: *party emoji*!

I wouldn't mind some improvements to the dialogue - especially the cringe swan line - but prefer to see poly interpretations better supported instead of having the monogamy path be the only path. Ironically I end the game with a pretty mono SH since my Tav doesn't want to hire the twins, cheat with Mizorra or climb mount Halsin. But I'm glad those are in the game for the people who like them.

But this just doesn't seem like a pressing issue where the endgame does. I want Larian to fix that before the revise the romances.

Originally Posted by Ehhhh123
Alright, enough. We're all repeating ourselves. We see one thing while you see another thing entirely. Let's just leave it at that. Although, most people playing the game as monogamous will believe that Shadowheart leans the same way. That's all I'll say.

Agreed. I will see her as a nesting partner, others as strictly mono. I hope the game supports both interpretations. I don't think it's an accident that mono people see SH as mono and poly people as poly. Is this the best interpretation of poly one could get? No. Is better than PF: Kingmaker? I think so, yes.