Originally Posted by KillerRabbit
Let me return your question to you - does it bother you that SH can kill the nightsong and pour her blood on the statue of Selune in attempt to deepen the grief of a mourning mother? If not, why does her capacity for evil offend you less than her capacity for ethical non monogamy?
Her capacity for evil offends me not for the same reason I will never have her go full evil. Because the only truly evil act she performs here out of her own will is take the Nightsong's blood. Which I agree, is actually very petty of her. But we're all capable of pettiness, and she wanted to impress her evil goddess.

She ends her storyline as Dark Justiciar with you having abandoned her to Shar while you were the only person that could've saved her. She's literally begging Shar to forget not only her murdering her own parents in frustration, but also forgetting that you did that to her. After that, Shar made her forget what it is like to be a good person again; back to square one, except now she's even more of a religious zealot based on position of power.

It fits well. I really like the writing, but I find it dark enough that I will not dabble. I can't do that to a person, fictional or not. The writing about any kind of non-monogamy, on the other hand, in its current state is inconsistent. I've said many times already that I would be content if it was written to make sense so long as a full-mono playthrough didn't get impacted. I still wouldn't dabble, just like her evil path, but I'd be fine with its addition.

But as it stands, a full-mono playthrough isn't impacted (with the exception of Halsin's self insert/flirting, for those that bring Halsin along), however the writing of these half assed attempts at having her fit Halsin as a out of character cameo are inconsistent and don't make sense.

Last edited by Michieltjuhh; 17/10/23 11:08 PM.