I feel like everyone arguing focuses way too much on the narrative point, which it's literally very normal to disagree on, because it's fiction, that's how it works, and more or less ignores the fact that we do, in fact, provide gameplay/mechanics reasoning (short quest, player influence, my head hurts I won't list all of that), which is valid to critique (just as Larian is free not to take that critique into account).

"I think her story is satisfactory as is" - Good! You like that type of stories, and we don't, that's a normal human condition. It's literally an agree to disagree type of a thing.

"It's totally normal that some origins got significantly less (sometimes almost twice as little iirc) scenes/locations/quest stages/plot forks than some others and it's mean-spirited and ungrateful to point that out about a character you like" - Really? Really-really? Like. Genuinely?

Originally Posted by rugglebutt
Gonna throw a thought in after lurking (I haven't seen it said yet, could be hidden in these 100+ pages): if they do end up creating a definitive edition, perhaps they could have it like they do with D:OS2 where you can play the original or DE. So those that like the current endings can still have them with the original and the DE with updated.

Oh hey, didn't know that D:OS2 allowed that. Would be perfect, in the theoretical scenario where something happens.

[Linked Image from tarraxahum.neocities.org]