Originally Posted by Walking Kole
Originally Posted by Conrad Curze
That's the exact opposite of what he said. The first line of the article says it all "different protagonists, different antagonists, different stakes". Like what more do you need, if the DLC will ever be released, it won't related to the main story.

You can have different protagonists in tandem with the original cast. Those are not mutually exclusive. When Swen says "You'd need different stakes, different environments, different protagonists, and antagonists", he's talking about how a DLC wouldn't ncessarily have to be at the end of the game but it would need an entirely new setting in order to not clash with the main game. Because if you implement new content within the main game, it's a lot of work and a lot could go wrong (as we can already see with their past few patches). But that has nothing to do with what they will or will not expand upon.

Originally Posted by Conrad Curze
There are no clues, it's just your and Kole's opinion. Nobody outside this thread thinks that her engine was ever supposed to be fixable, I was quite surprised to find out you actually think otherwise for some reason, despite the obvious writing on the wall that it was never the case

Given I just proved you wrong, you ought to concede the point. You're not active on social media, so you're not aware of the discourse. That's fine. But don't pretend like you know for a fact what the prevailing opinion is among the engaged fandom.
I don't follow every thread or post on social media but it's clear you overestimate the "engaged fandom". There were some threads on reddit but those are either old or literal memes made for fun. There are some weirdos on twitter but those are also just some guys complaining for the sake of complaining. You put some nice arguments, I'll give you that but it was just two or three guys, calling it engaged fandom is a bit of a stretch