You are totally confusing objective data and subjective criticism/flaws as proven by the quote and your answer to Niara.
To be honnest it is really hilarious to read that "the greater number of lootable vase in BG3" is "definitely a thing that make BG3 better". Don't get me wrong I'm glad it is something you enjoy... But I've seen A LOT more complaints about inventory management and looting in BG3 than I read complaints about the lack of checks in dialogs in 2 games that were released 20 years ago.
I could even say that inventory management and looting is even more enjoyable in those 2 old games than in BG3^^ But sure it is subjective... exactly like your definition of a "better" role playing game.
I initially planned to give you objective data too but to be honnest it looks totally useless to talk with you and I'm done with endless discussions about BG3^^ BG3 is an awesome game but it's a very poor representation of the world in which it takes place... Which is at least as much important to me than "dialogs checks" to be a "better" role playing video game.
What would you consider as better representation of the world? Is this going to be an endless debate of what you personally think how the world looks and insist that it is indeed *the* world representation and how million other players probably wrong, but yours is not? Just checking.
Also yes, definitely, how many vase you can loot = better game. There is no possibility in the world that it was a sarcasm at all.
