This site you are opining on is filled with pages of people talking about how interesting they think the villains are. Players have spent a staggering number of hours wandering around this game soaking up every detail for months. Most RPGs are save the world stories. That's what's on the BG3 tin. Did you click blindly without regard to what you were buying?
If we are saying it how it is: you and people expressing the same view think your opinion is superior to everyone else simply because it's yours.
People voted for the game because they enjoyed it. Even if it isn't necessarily designed to comfortably be a let-the-world-burn-and-laugh story or whatever it is you would have preferred. They are not uninformed or wrong because they don't have the same tastes you do. They are just not you.
Which is good. A planet full of you sneering at each other would be unpleasant. For all of you.
"Scraping the Barrel" certainly misrepresents the problems with the story of BG3. It had many plot holes, the execution is sloppy, it does not fit the mechanics (artificial time pressure), has uninteresting villains, swaps out the entire premise within seconds (tadpoles), has many lose ends that are not resolved and even if working perfectly is a generic save the world story, not any better that all other RPGs.
Lets say it how it is, fans blindly clicked on everything BG3 without regard what they even voted for.
