Nope. I was not in EA, but I have more than a few words about the self-congratulating interviews that didn't actually pan out in the game, such as claiming that burning down Act 1 would 'completely change how the story goes' or 'it's up to the player the roles the various factions like the Zhent play' and 'not like other RPG romances' and other statements. Even now, getting a clear answer on how and when Minthara was fixed is like pulling teeth. People were left to speculate for months on what 'voice actors being called back to the studio' even meant for the game. No one knows if it was about the game at all, since there was a youtube series with the VAs a few weeks later and it took Patch 3 for hinting about epilogues?
Community Support is for honest transparency. This is not it.
I felt the same way with the 'technical advancement' award as well, given that out of the line up, BG3 was the buggiest and most unstable by FAAAAARRR with very few of its systems actually working as intended for months on end. It's a party based RPG with companions that have been bugged since release and patches since then bugging others. I played DOS1 and 2, environmental reactivity is almost a decade old. Even the multiplayer was broken more often than not.