Originally Posted by Auric
I thought I was pretty clear I wasn't here to score points by seeing who can most insufferably twist a discussion with intentionally ridiculous false equivalences and more or less meaningless appeals to a type of logic that in practice doesn't exist outside of debate. So this is goodbye between us, I think.
For someone who didn't like the term fallacy, and apparently doesn't like rationality, you sure are quick to accuse others of false equivalencies as an excuse to not address anything when you are the one that equated how TTRPG modules for tabletop campaigns with randoms handles story to a CRPG video game made by professionals should be handling story. Logic has great relevance in fields such as science, for example, forming and supporting hypothesis, conclusions and peer review papers of PhDs.

'Doesn't exist outside of debate.'

Good grief.

Last edited by Rahaya; 19/11/23 02:18 AM.