Originally Posted by Taril
Originally Posted by Rotsen
Originally Posted by ldo58
Sex which you can entirely ignore if you want to

I'm sorry but this argument always makes me laugh. If you close your eyes it doesn't exist lmao.

I'm not sure we should be considering any sexualization to be overly sexualized.
It...doesn't matter if you are not sure if we should be considering any sexualization to be overly sexualized because no one is actually doing that.

Which is the same problem as the post referenced.

Take the OP's example. 'Sex exists' is not the problem with Minthara. In a vacuum. Since it is not in a vacuum you have the situation where Minthara is non-negotiable with losing a TON of actual game content and her own companion specific content was bugged to hell and back on release and still feels incomplete.

But her sex scene was not only intact from the beginning, but is the most explicit bar none and is only available if you actively help her raid the grove, instead of not interfering.

Which means that the issue is not 'sex exists.'

The issue becomes 'this...looks an AWFUL LOT like the developers decided that hot Drow sex is the 'reward' for an evil playthrough instead of quest content.'

This is one example, of many, that reveals where the priorities were to the active detriment of the game.

Argue THAT.

Not 'sex exists.'