See, what's unfortunate is that there is a discussion around topics like 'what does queer-coded mean?' and 'is "x' queer because they can be gay?', but when you focus on this bizarre "gay men hit on me all the time, I'm super built" thing, it just gets really weird, really fast.
When you focus on 1% of what I wrote concerning my physical appearance, that’s when it gets ‘really weird, really fast’.
The other 99% of the words I wrote are where it’s all at mate, but then again you were asking some truly – how shall I politely put it? – ‘puzzling’ questions such as ‘Original post? Original post where? Who are you? Do we know you or something that we'd have prior knowledge of these posts?’
I frankly can’t tell if you’re being insincere, or paranoid, or what is going on with that line of interrogation – but it clearly has nothing to do with the comments I originally posted, nor does it add anything constructive to the discourse.
You’re welcome to quote specific pieces of text from the original post and to call them ‘weird’. Buy ideally you’d expand on that to clarify why that’s the case.
My sixth sense though is saying you have no interest in engaging with the content in a neutral, constructive way – but perhaps you can prove me wrong.
