Hey,

To send feedback to Larian you use the bug report form but you change it "feedback"

https://larian.com/support/faqs/how-to-submit-a-bug-report_85


Sometimes you get a reply, sometimes you don't.

I have loads to say about how I would change it but - as brief as I can be:

I would like to see a fully developed "distrust" path in the game. Starting with the ability to tell the dream visitor to shut up about tadpoles. If you know you aren't going to use them the repetitive "there's an illithid tadpole . . ." gets, well, repetitive. Enough! Tadpoles, got it, not going to use them and wish I could squish them.

The conversation after the stabbing should be very different - if my toon is sitting in her PJs next to the dream visitor it's because she is enthralled. I get that the emperor is very powerful mind flayer and probably has advantage + proficiency on all persuasion checks but this is should be a contested check. My toon's insight or perception vs the emperor's persuasion.

At the bare minimum the fact that we have just dispelled the illusion should be acknowledged. "I know this is a projection but what are you? Are you the tadpole? The absolute? An elder brain"?

There's a bug in Patch 5 that prevents Viconia from acknowledging that Shadowheart is in you party - even if you have Shadowheart talk to her. And I'm glad it showed up TBH otherwise I would not have found a dialogue tree that describes my toon's relationship with the emperor pretty well: Vicionia says she senses that you both need the artifact and hate it at the same time.

I want that feeling - this is alliance in which one of the parties hates the other - be acknowledged by the game. I'd not going to sit by side with my manipulator and contemplate the beauty of his enslavement of Orpheus. Perhaps meeting across a table? Something that reflects the emotional distance between the two. "keep your distance darling"

More than anything else I want distrustful Tav to have good lines. "your presence disgusts me" isn't a good line but it's the only one available to a distrustful Tav. "disgust" implies that Tav is motivated by xenophobia and not by: a) a moral objection to the emperor's actions or b) resentment at being lied to

Because my toon would be happy to sit next to Omelleum and talk about our plans to stop the absolute.

And, again, this is a bare minimum.

Ideally, I would like Tav to have the ability to challenge the emperor about the lies he's told and not allow him to have the final word when challenged. And I would like a "freedom from my bonds" speech like the one Astarian got once he killed Cazador . . .