Larian Studios Forums Baldur's Gate III Baldur's Gate III - Story & Character Discussion Early Access - Leftovers & Inconsistencies

This battleaxe used to belong to the enthralled man saying "I'm a bit peaked mum, think I'll go to bed early".

Although this entire area got cut off from the game (terrible mistake as it was far more epic), the axe remains there still.

During Early Access because of the whole concept with the Dreamer being unique to each person, this concept was also subtly hinted for the Absolute as well which is why some NPCs referred to the Absolute as "HIM".

Eventually the Absolute became canonically female, but this Goblin Warlock at Minthara's camp party is still using its outdated Early Access voicelines where it keeps referring to the Absolute as "HIM".

During Early Access this wall did not exist at all, instead there was a massive hole with some rope and tools scattered around implicating that Philomeen climbed up this wall to escape the Duergar and by doing so avoided the gooey-ceiling enemies that the party instead fights on their way to her.

Even though a new wall was added (evidently by the misaligned bricks), the party still comments as if someone climbed through that hole which no longer exists.

Although Dark Urge became introduced with full release, the character keeps using the generic dialogue choices for the tadpole insertion through the eye (which all characters are using since Early Access).

HOWEVER this is impossible and contradictory to the lore because Dark Urge was not tadpoled through the eye nor even tadpoled on the Nautiloid itself, therefore they should not be recalling the eye insertion which never happened to begin with. This inconsistency begins very early with Us and keeps going on throughout the game with Gale, Nettie, the corpse of the tadpoled merchant at the Nautiloid crash site, etc...