Originally Posted by Rahaya
Originally Posted by snowram
Originally Posted by Thunderbolt
Originally Posted by snowram
the old standard to the modern age
And what would these "old standards" be exactly?
We were talking about reactivity. I am seriously at a loss when trying to find a AAA game with ANY reactivity in the past 10 years. The Witcher 3 has a tiny bit of it. Can Kingdom Comes be considered a AAA game?
No, we're talking about the video about games to learn from and how in the 'reactivity' column, there are better examples to pick from. That you have narrowed the subject down to AAA games from 10 years kind of shows the weaknesses of this approach.
I don't see where my approach is "weak", let's just not compare compare apples with pears. Of course there are smaller and older games with better reactivity, just like there are independent movies with better plots than blockbusters or indie songs with more intricate composition than top of the charts. However looking at each feature in a vacuum is ultimately meaningless in the grand scope of things and you have to consider the current context. I am just comparing games that can be compared and you just have moved the goalpost. So I repeat, where can I find a game like BG3 with as much production value and reactivity?