The "good" vs "evil" is not what an RPG should be like, otherwise it's just propaganda, where they show clear bias towards one side.
By the way, there is no better motivator for evil than persistent propaganda of "good". Propaganda itself causes such disgust that a person automatically has the desire to do something to spite what they try to shove into him.
Originally Posted by Ametris
It's the same crap they pulled when making Tav only horny for Astarion's body or power or being a moralising paladin. Which yet again, is contradictory. Previously, they made Tav into a sex-crazed nympho who only ascended Astarion out of horniness for him, but now they make them not enjoy the kisses. So are they sex-crazed or not? It's all so ridiculous, words fail me.
This one!
Originally Posted by Ametris
Yes, they take away our roleplay options because someone at Larian has a boner for the abuser theme. This is the only evil male romance in the game. I don't want to it be ruined for some hamfisted morality lessons.
Let's just say I'll never play BG3 without having a romance with Astarion. And I will never deny him Ascension. Yes, my Tav can go to great lengths for Astarion and against the "good" that is supposed to "break" Astarion. But the question is, why should a player go to war with the game for the opportunity to do what he wants to do? In a good RPG, one should confront those in-game obstacles and challenges that arise from the game's story, as part of the roleplay, not go to war with the scenario itself.
