Agreed. The difference is that lazy positive feedback is positive: it reinforces having fun playing the game (or developing the game). Which is inherently valuable. Lazy negative criticism spreads negativity without providing value.
The forum is to discuss the game, not cheerlead for it. Lazy positive feedback has no more value than lazy negative feedback.
Personally I've no problem with either. Some feedback (positive or negative) may appear lazy because it lacks specifics but that doesn't mean it is lazy. Not everyone wishes to write lengthy posts and there is no minimum character requirement to post here.
One of the most useful and impactful forms of feedback here is also incredibly lazy..... the ubiquitous "+1".
BTW Killer Rabbit that Gawker Article was a fine read.
