Originally Posted by Ranxerox
Originally Posted by Jordaker
No. You made the statement so the onus is on you to proffer the evidence to back it up. Trying to throw it back at me suggests you have no evidence.


No

Germain made the original comment that it is not complex with scant evidence offered that did nothing other than to assert that at least one other game was more complex.
You then agreed without offering any further evidence.

So you and Germain are the ones making assertions without evidence.

The game is large and complex compared to many computer/console games and required a rather large development team.

That’s bleeding obvious.


I see Taril has got in first but it was indeed Wolverine who made the initial assertion to which I responded. Germain posted mainly agreeing with my position. You then repeated the original assertion.

A dog is large compared to a mouse; a horse is large compared to a dog. A dog is physically larger than a mouse; a horse is physically larger than a dog. BG3 is large compared to what? How is BG3 larger than this thing? Ditto 'complex'.
The size of the development team is irrelevant.

Last edited by Jordaker; 16/07/24 08:11 PM.