Originally Posted by Wormerine
You are again referring to narrative outcomes

Yes, because YOU brought these situations up. I literally said that. It's literally in the part of my post you quoted.

Originally Posted by Wormerine
There are very few ways you can navigate through a Deadfire levels, there are a lot of systems and interactions you can use to sneak through BG3 level. I haven’t seen much emergent gameplay in Deadfire (things devs didn’t intend players to do) while BG3 is full of this stuff.

Yes, as I said, Deadfire favours more narrative complexity rather than gameplay complexity. Deadfire creates more possible outcomes for decisions and has "Dialogue option" style decision making to determine player interactions.

While BG3 is narratively simple with very few outcomes for decisions, but more gameplay complexity as you manually have to take actions using the toolset available.

Originally Posted by Wormerine
And yes, Fallouts and Arcanum would be closest games to BG3 that I can think of, but they are still less complex (again, compare robustness of individual systems) and buggy (at least arcanum).

Even comparing robustness of individual systems, they're not inferior to BG3. For example, Skyrim and Fallout also do the line of sight, light levels, sound etc. Heck, they even specifically do line of sight from... NPC's actual eyes (Leading to the notorious "Put buckets on everyone's head and steal everything" meme in Skyrim). They also have more complex object mobility. So it's not just "ONE ASPECT" of BG3 they're comparable to...