Yes, I finished the game as Gale and stopped mid act 2 as Shadowheart. Can you elaborate on why you would suspect me on not playing an Origin character? It wasn't quite clear.
What I meant by 'a singular end' was a specific ending for characters that dictate their motivations, overriding other possible vision for the character and their story. Like Wyll going ham torturing demons in avernus because of *insert trauma*. I don't want a couple of 'evil' choices at the turning points to railroad the plot into a particular scenario like this.
What makes 'God Gale' ending good, for example, is that you can interprete 'Ambition' very broadly. This ending can tickle the evil box or can be perfectly suitable for a good character who just advocates for change in the world, or can be seen as falling for the 'godhood' trap and losing humanity. Thats what makes good writing, in my opinion.
It seems we disagree on what makes an ending open, then. Gale's ambition ending already dictates the character's motivation: to become a god. I disagree that this is an open ending that fits all alignments, or even suitable for good characters. Because Gale's choice is the same gamble Karsus faced. And Karsus' gamble led to many innocent deaths. A good character advocating for a change would not risk the lives of many. Sure, you can say nothing bad happens in Gale's story, he did not destroy the weave; but that is only after playing that ending. To repeat myself, your way of roleplaying is more like metagaming to me.
