Many spawn fans like the ascended path too. Seeing it as a tragedy does not make someone less of a "real" fan, and someone primarily liking the UA ending doesn't mean their interpretation should be discarded as "not an AA fan, so it doesn't matter and should not be reflected in the game".
I don't believe you or anyone else is "delusional" for their interpretation of a fictional romance path. What bothers me is insisting that other people with different interpretations of the narrative are just "spawn fans" and therefore should be discarded when things like this are discussed.
For context, all of my characters romance AA, because that story is more compelling and important to me.
But asking for a toggle does not make sense unless they add a toggle for everyone.
Why not? The other characters never had different reactions for Tav players could want back.
Respectfully, where are you getting that I said any of this? I stated explicitly:
"Are there AA fans who think that too? Sure. This is not me saying you or anyone with ab*se RP is a "fake fan". It's an acknowledgement that the "majority" you're referencing are *self identified spawn fans*."
The people I'm quoting have themselves said "I am not a fan of AA. I prefer spawn."
You are an AA fan. People who like AA are fans. I was specifically talking about people who themselves explicitly say that they are not. Please don't twist my words. My only intent in posting here was to provide my own feedback on why I think toggles are unnecessary, unfair, and a wrong choice to make.
But if you think people who select certain dialogue options should be met with visceral
with no content warning, or context warning in the game at all, so you can have RP for a small niche audience, you are allowed to want that.
I am here to say that would be a poor decision on Larian's part. My feedback is simply that RP has not been killed by the new patch. And removing the dead dove content was a very respectable call.
