Originally Posted by 🌸Yume🌸
I don't think it's fair that people are arguing against compromising and giving players more choice. Especially when limiting role-play was the exact same argument given to support this change in the first place. This is an RPG game where making choices is a major mechanic, and both sets of expressions already exist. Emotions are high. People felt upset by patch 6. That's valid. I also feel extremely upset by both patch 6 and 7 for various reasons. My feelings are just as valid as anyone else's. Politely disagreeing with someone is not a personal attack.

I think at this point we're likely just talking past each other. From what I've seen, most of the people against the toggle or "option" are against it for the very same reasons we were against the faces in patch 6.

It's triggering.
Dead dove/ non-con should not be in place without a trigger warning.
The only way to avoid it would be via meta gaming.
The doubt that general audiences want to play an ab*** victim that is sprung on them as a surprise.
And the fear faces create a character dynamic the story does not support, and it turns a favored and loved character into something that is triggering and harmful to many players, as well as creates an extreme inconsistency with what's already written.

I see few people arguing against RP. More simply the points above. In fact, as I and a few others have already said (/gen), "it's not about the roleplay".

For me personally it's about protecting other a***e victims, unwitting players, and myself. From my perspective, the number of players triggered by non-con being *in* the game will outweigh the number who are triggered by it *not being* in the game. So I will continue to propose it stay out of the game.