People are asking for this path to be changed again because they want to support their narrative reading (typically noncon/ ‘abusive’) of this path.
i dont understand whose side youre on here. nobody wants to support noncon or abusive paths, but there is absolutely a space for scared facial expressions in this. there are valid reasons. listen, i am totally with you, AA doesnt HAVE to be triggering a scared expression, but the reaction is valid and should be in the game.
Originally Posted by SpookyBookey
You have multiple times and opportunities to break up with AA if you are unhappy with the dynamic, so I think adding additional flags for facial expressions is the wrong move - especially if they lock you into selecting certain dialogue options (which will limit roleplaying).
i am not saying i can NEVER break up with him, but there is a difference between smiling enthusiastically and then breaking up vs being scared and breaking up. why would you break up if you enjoyed the kiss? like i said, the flagged dialogues are a suggestion. there can be a different dialogue that is more suitable.
Originally Posted by SpookyBookey
to not change the facial expression since they are the most neutral ones out of any kisses in the game.
i do not understand what is neutral about those. if you think scared tav is not neutral, but enthusiastically smiling is, how? there is nothing neutral about either of those.
the problem is that only having one facial expression will always upset the other side of the argument here. so i dont understand why we cant have both. none and both will be canon at the same time because you can only have one in YOUR game. just like UA is no more canon than AA since you cant have both.
