So my reading is completely valid and based on AA's possible canon. This exists in the game for a reason.
Originally Posted by Rote90
It is already in canon.
Dear Rote90, in case you missed my earlier, concise message, I kindly implored us all to stop taking our head-canons and interpretations as canon. It's best when it's presented as 'my opinion'. I strongly believe, we should stick to that and appeal to common sense. Ignoring this is highly detrimental to any discussion. Thank you, Rote90.
I said BASED on canon. I've never said that my interpretation is canon. There is a big difference. I said that because my interpretation can be drawn from canon events. I have never said that you can't interpret them differently. I thought that "my reading" wording makes it obvious that it's my opinion. The only thing that I called "already in canon" is the fact that if you try to break up with him after tadpoles are gone, he won't let you. Will you tell me now that objective facts from the game shouldn't be called "canon"?
Quote
Haarlep is not a significant character. He is not a romantic companion.
But AA is canonically an evil companion. And yes, this time I really mean that it's not just my interpretation. He is evil, canon shows that in the new evil endings with Tav and Durge, where only he and Minthara can rule together with evil Tav. Neil on different paths for Astarion: "Can become a friend, fall in love or become a terrible-terrible person"
And yeah, sorry, but I'm not reading all of your post. It's too long for me and time-consuming.
