Pretty off-topic, so I hide my opinion about what I consider canon:
Quote
And please don't consider the opinions of other forum members as "headcanon" when your opinion can be put in the same category. That's biased and aggressive.
If you want to put facts from the game and from the game's files, explicitly stated by Larian's developers, into the category of "headcanon" instead of "canon" then okay, it's your opinion. I also have my right to have my opinion of what counts as canon in this game and what doesn't.
Yes, facts from the game and from developers notes for me are totally canon. Otherwise, we can't say that anything is canon anymore. Every single fact from canon needs to be called "headcanon", otherwise it is "biased and aggressive"?
1. Developer notes do say that Tav is AA's spawn and they can't get away from him after tadpoles are gone.
2. You really can't break up with AA after tadpoles are gone. The game doesn't allow you to do it, no matter what you do after it.
These are two objective facts I was talking about.
So sorry, but I respectfully disagree. I've never said that people aren't allowed their own interpretations of canon. But there are also objective facts which, I think, I have my right to call canon, since they do exist objectively.

Quote
Guys, are there pros or just three cons?
I don't think we should bring arguments from other venues here. Judging by the screenshot you provided, you only represent one side in resolving the dispute - your own.By not providing analogies. That's not fair. There is no positive momentum here that people have been asking for for six months.

Of course, you are very welcome to give your feedback on how this line about making a happy expression should sound/be written.
This was merely a popular suggestion to solve this problem.

Last edited by Rote90; 17/09/24 10:32 PM.