Larian Studios Forums Baldur's Gate III Baldur's Gate III - Suggestions & Feedback Patch 7 Ascended Astarion's kisses goes against his story as written

You aren't gonna erase Patch 6 with scared faces, which totally suited our RPs, from our memory by repeating the same points. Unless Larian makes a statement where they say that your feedback had no influence on their decision to change scared faces, people have their right to assume that scared faces were changed only due to fans' feedback. Since making animations is a lot of work in the first place, it's very hard to believe that scared faces were merely 'a mistake'. It's not like you can slip and animate the wrong kind of faces by accident. This was clearly a discussed and intentional decision which perfectly suited AA's narrative about "repeating the cycle of abuse".

Yes, people don't. But this thread was made for people who aren't happy with Patch 7 changes and ask Larian to give us an option to choose. If your only feedback and response to this is that you are totally against ANY kind of compromise, if you can't suggest any kind of solution for people with other RP's to have an option to play as they see fit too, just like you already have, if you only reject all our suggestions without proposing any other way to handle this issue, then you are only repeating the same point over and over and over again: i.e. that you are against other people's RP NO MATTER WHAT. After this the other side just repeats the same old points how for them AA relationship is not abusive and why. We already discussed this multiple times. You aren't gonna change people's opinion that this is abusive relationship and they have total right to play it as abuse by repeating the same points.
And moderators clearly told us not to make repetitive posts.

So instead of making your point with one post that you are against any kind of compromise and moving on, your side is just trying to take over the thread which was not made for you, but for people who want to have an option to choose. You are trying to bury our feedback under repetitive posts about how there should be no compromise at all. We already know that you are totally against it and want no compromise. This is not a new suggestion. You are providing no new information. This is not arguing in good faith. This goes directly against what our moderators asked you to do.

I came up with a new suggestion how an option to choose can be implemented. In response I got all the same old posts about "we don't want to compromise, only our RP is valid".
It's your side who wants to say the last word in the thread made primarily for feedback from the other side of this argument. So yes, "moving on" suggestion applies to you in the first place.