Originally Posted by Anska
Look, Wyll, you won an award by omission. *giggles* Please carry on, this was just very funny to me.

Yeah... He's literally the only companion that hasn't got a messed up love life. Things are are a little complicated with Mizora and his contract, but he's just your average bachelor. Hence him hitting on Shadowheart and Lae'zel constantly in Act 1.

Originally Posted by Djoperdjo
Exactly. Why would a woman who genuinely believes the Fuhrer is a messiah - as many did in the late 1930s - risk her life and reputation for a Jewish husband?

Did many believe that Adolf was a messiah? Or was he simply talking about empowering the country post-WW1 wherein they were crippled not only by the cost of the war itself, but also shackled by the Treaty of Versailes afterward...

Also, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make with this statement. Your prior points are all about "Love doesn't exist if someone doesn't give up everything immedietly in favour of their partner" but here you're pointing out that there are individuals who might value their patriotism more than their husband (Whom they love)

Originally Posted by Djoperdjo
"Yes, I betrayed you, but you have to understand my circumstances" - that's how all traitors talk. Half-loyalty is despised by both friends and enemies.

This is quite literally your entire scenario with Lae'zel. The one you're complaining about.

You're upset that she's upset when you literally betrayed her.

The fact you don't see this and instead pin the blame on Lae'zel for "Betraying you" when she's invariable upset at you betraying her kind of gives of major narcissist vibes...

Also, my comment hadn't anything to do with betrayal. Just that loyalty and love can make for very difficult decisions, ones that are not to be taken lightly.

Originally Posted by Djoperdjo
In a family that wins evolution, one member protects another at all cost.

And that's what's happening.

The husband, is protecting the wife (And potential children) by sacrificing his own freedom to ensure they are unharmed.

This is actually evolutionary more beneficial than the wife harbouring the fugitive husband and putting both of them (Plus any children) at risk.

It's actually a staple of evolutionary design, with many species having the male sacrifice themselves to protect the females and offspring (It also appears in disaster protocols, where women and children get priority for life boats and the like)