BG3 had wonderful characters with great stories and was as complex as you could get with so many choices and varied paths. Maybe you should think about why you are focused on the bear sex.
I heavily disagree. BG3 had shallow characters as each of them had to be easy to get playersexuals.
That limited both the possible characters, no old companions, no short ones and their stories and characters to all being not comitted and looking.
Other rpgs which are less focused on romance and thirsting thus can have much mire interesting characters, see Rogue Trader or Wrath.
Even the sexually open character in Kingmaker and up more interesting than the BG3 ones in that regard as their everything goes attitude contrasts with other characters while in BG3 everyone us basically the same.
The choices are also pretty rpg standard with them either being a railroad or having a good and evil path decided by a single conversation and the evil oath usually pretty undeveloped. Here too other rpgs have some mire complex examples like good Wenduang.
The focus on the bear sex us because it represents BG3s failure very well. Focusing on sexual spectacle to draw in the casual audience while sacrificing core part of rpgs, story and characters, for it.
And I will remain wary if Larian continues to go down that route.
In all this discussion, it's noticeable that the people who have a problem with this are filling the forums with these threads and turning a few encounters into an entire game. It's tiresome and I hope Larian sticks to his plans.
I want attractive companions, or at least ones that are still visually appealing. It's fine and the success of BG3 proved Larian right.
Strange, considering this forum is more filled with threads by people who ask for more gore/smut....
