Originally Posted by Erwin Smith
Originally Posted by Nausved
It seems that you have a very specific and very narrow taste in men's faces, which doesn't align with my own tastes in men (like, AT ALL). I think if you're that picky about the way characters look, you should probably just use mods. That's what mods are for.

For the base game, I think it's more important to have a diversity of faces, rather than try to align to a very specific kind of face, because everyone has different preferences.

I could say the same to you, but in reverse: The game should have handsome faces and attractive romance options available, and you'll have to wait months to get less handsome faces as you wish (but you know that probably nobody will make those mods...) Do you understand my point?

There's a reason why there are LOTS handsome/pretty face mods to BG3, MANY players were dissatisfied with the faces the game had to offer.

Larian should think about that in the next game. Let there be more diversity, not SO MANY faces devoid of beauty. grin

I think you've missed my point. You are not the arbiter of what is attractive and what is unattractive. For example, Astarion is widely regarded as unusually handsome, yet you apparently think he's unattractive. (Astarion isn't my type, either, but I find him WAY more handsome than any of the examples you've provided here. And I'm generally pretty meh about Astarion. Wyll's face is much, much closer to my type.)

Instead of trying to adhere to just one person's tastes, Larian should strive to represent a lot of different people's tastes. Some people's preferences might not be represented, particularly if they're very picky, but offering a diversity of faces means that at least MOST people's preferences can be represented.