I just don't enjoy evil runs.
Neither do I. But that's because most "Evil Runs" are done terribly.
There's no nuance or any tangible believability. It's just "Haha, be a jerk and murder everyone because you're a stupid jerk who's a jerk and stupid"
I play video games because life is dark and challenging enough; I want to lose myself in a space where I can look forward to a happy ending, or at the very least a bittersweet one. Misery and relentless darkness just hold no joy. I like being the scrappy hero who romances Morrigan and Shadowheart, who gets a kick out of redemption arcs and not abusing the weak.
Ironically, Grimdark settings play into this.
Happy endings and redemption arcs hit harder when the world they're taking place in is dark and overbearing.
Meaning these things happening are exceptional, not the de facto result.
This is one of the main draws to Grimdark. The world sucks. Everything is horrible. Yet, if you try hard enough, you can find that glimmer of hope and push on for a good ending.
It's not just Hello Kitty where everything is nice and comforting and nothing bad can ever happen. So anything good happening doesn't feel rewarding.
We see in forums and social media people asking all of the time for darker games or more evil play-throughs, or more misleading and anxiety ridden choices. From the proliferation of these posts, it is easy to think that it is a majority of players asking for this, but my suspicion is that it is far from the truth.
Debatable.
Grimdark gets a pretty big following as a genre. Like, the entire Warhammer IP is based on it and that's one of the largest in the world. Not to mention popular IP's such as Witcher or Game of Thrones.
Also, a lot of people asking for these things are frustrated in the complete lack of representation. Both in terms of IP's that include these themes, but also games within a series trending away from them (For example, Dragon Age: Origins was Grimdark. But as the series went on it left it behind more and more)
People who loved BG3 or DOS2 don't complain about the game being not dark enough
I've seen people who loved DOS2 complain about it not being dark enough.
Though DOS2 is plenty dark in of itself. There's quite a lot of awful things happening in that game. I mean, you start off in a camp of slaves. With a crazy torture chamber underground (That features countless body parts strewn about the place, as well as a mound of them on the other side of its sewage pipe) guarded by a bunch of people who have been mutilated and lobotomised. Even as you go to leave the island, you face sentries of people mutilated so horrifically they shoot death lasers out of their face at you.
Even after that, when you start learning Sourcery, the whole thing is you rip the soul out of people to fuel it.
Baldur's Gate (And D&D as a whole) isn't quite as dark as Divinity. It has its moments, especially with plenty of racism and otherworldly horrors. But generally it's more chill given its basis being in providing a generic fantasy setting for people to make their own stories in. Unlike other TTRPG's that do create a Grimdark setting (Like Vampire: The Masquerade, Cyberpunk, Blades in the Dark, Witcher, Dark Heresy etc)
I just hope Larian uses what people actually played; the roles, the 'alignments', the romances, the alliances, as the basis for balancing Divinity, rather than listening to the squeaky wheels.
The issue with this is that many people didn't play "Evil" route in BG3 because BG3's evil route was so bad.
Which is the problem with this sort of data, it's heavily influenced by confirmation bias.
The good route was more fleshed out and supported, ergo, more people played it.
Even then, having actual "Evil" routes makes for better "Good" routes. As decisions about trying to be a hero are less obvious and straightforward. There will be more nuance in how you choose what to do because it will not just be half-arsed comically evil option vs blatantly beneficial heroic option. You'll have more shades of grey where things aren't so clear cut as well as things like "Evil" options that are legitimately enticing without being obviously wrong.
That said, Larian themselves advocate doing stuff because they want the stuff there rather than focusing only on popularity. This is why they like to add non-Human/Elf races despite Human/Elf being by far the most popular choices.
If people want more fleshed out evil run options, fine, but just don't make the entire world darker and more miserable for the majority of us who want games that let us experience joy and an aspect of being a hero in a real life where being a hero is ever more challenging and rare.
The thing is... Divinity already
IS a dark and miserable world.
That's how it has been portrayed across its games. Especially Original Sin, which very much revolves around the Grimdark aspects of the setting.
People advocating for the new Divinity to be dark are wanting more of what has been established, rather than the brighter and more hopeful nature of BG3. Or the watering down that many other series are afflicted by because modern studios are too afraid to maintain the Grimdark settings that made their worlds interesting.
This doesn't mean you can't be a hero and every ending has to be bad (A la Cyberpunk 2077). It just means that the overall world is one where hardship and suffering is commonplace. You can still rise up to be a hero and make a difference, with such actions having far more impact due to the dark nature of the setting.
