Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#717531 26/10/20 02:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2020
P
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
P
Joined: Oct 2020
I’m so very disappointed in this “prerelease”. Ultimately I paid $60 to be a beta tester. At the stage of development this game is in, it should never have been released. Call it “prerelease” or what you will, you should be ashamed of yourselves @larian.

One thing I have discovered is that the game is somewhat playable if I play in offline mode with steam. Otherwise, I’m forced to close and restart the game between loading previous saves. I also have to reboot my computer periodically or I suffer intolerable lag.

Hopefully soon this will at least be a polished turd, and I can feel I spent $60 on something that doesn’t look as bad but still stinks like a turd.

Joined: Oct 2020
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2020
Well at least the post fits the name.

Joined: Sep 2020
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Sep 2020
Let me make sure that I understand this correctly. You're upset that you bought into an early access experience that feels like an early access experience, and it's somehow Larian's fault that your setup is struggling?


I don't want to fall to bits 'cos of excess existential thought.

Joined: Oct 2020
P
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
P
Joined: Oct 2020
Early access should at least be playable without all of the bugs and problems that players are seeing. A “prerelease” should be a playable game with minor bugs.
Essentially what larian did was release a shell and suckered people into paying to be beta testers. There’s a difference between beta testing a game and paying for a playable prerelease

Last edited by PMSbloodrage; 26/10/20 02:40 PM.
Joined: Oct 2020
C
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
C
Joined: Oct 2020
this post is bound to trigger someone, haha

Joined: Sep 2020
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Sep 2020
Originally Posted by PMSbloodrage
Early access should at least be playable without all of the bugs and problems that players are seeing. A “prerelease” should be a playable game with minor bugs.
Essentially what larian did was release a shell and suckered people into paying to be beta testers. There’s a difference between beta testing a game and paying for a playable prerelease


So by your logic, the people who've invested 75-100 hours at this point haven't been able to get anywhere or do anything. They've logged those hours just starting up the game and standing around.
And Larian hardly "suckered anyone in." Most people understand what the early access process is. They even warned people multiple times that if they were looking for a complete, more-perfect product, they should wait until release because the early access process was going to be imperfect and evolve slowly. It's not their fault that you didn't do any research. The game is perfectly playable. Stop being dramatic to make a point.


I don't want to fall to bits 'cos of excess existential thought.

Joined: Oct 2020
P
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
P
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by Tzelanit
Originally Posted by PMSbloodrage
Early access should at least be playable without all of the bugs and problems that players are seeing. A “prerelease” should be a playable game with minor bugs.
Essentially what larian did was release a shell and suckered people into paying to be beta testers. There’s a difference between beta testing a game and paying for a playable prerelease


So by your logic, the people who've invested 75-100 hours at this point haven't been able to get anywhere or do anything. They've logged those hours just starting up the game and standing around.
And Larian hardly "suckered anyone in." Most people understand what the early access process is. They even warned people multiple times that if they were looking for a complete, more-perfect product, they should wait until release because the early access process was going to be imperfect and evolve slowly. It's not their fault that you didn't do any research. The game is perfectly playable. Stop being dramatic to make a point.


cgexile #717557 26/10/20 02:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Feb 2020
Originally Posted by cgexile
this post is bound to trigger someone, haha



LOL too late

Joined: Oct 2020
P
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
P
Joined: Oct 2020
I’m voicing my opinion, as you are yours.

I’ve beta tested several games in the past 20 years that were far more complete than this.

You’re entitled to your opinion and to troll as you like

Joined: Oct 2020
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2020
Can we stop feeding the little juvenile troll?

Thanks.

Joined: Feb 2020
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Feb 2020
I've played through 3 times, ranger, rogue, wizard, and crashed twice. I've ran into some bugs but nothing game breaking or caused me to rage quit. I send my bug report and move on. If you have beta tested before then you know "this is the way".

Joined: Oct 2020
D
member
Offline
member
D
Joined: Oct 2020
This kind of feedback is more suited as crash reports when they happen along with whatever info Larian needs to investigate what's causing the crashes. This post isn't helpful to anyone

Joined: Jan 2011
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2011
Originally Posted by PMSbloodrage
I’m voicing my opinion, as you are yours.

I’ve beta tested several games in the past 20 years that were far more complete than this.

You’re entitled to your opinion and to troll as you like


It's not even beta though. It's Alpha even on Act 1 and we'll never see the other acts before release.

Now you see why Larian was shocked a million people bought into this.

Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Las Vegas, NV
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by PMSbloodrage
Early access should at least be playable without all of the bugs and problems that players are seeing. A “prerelease” should be a playable game with minor bugs.
Essentially what larian did was release a shell and suckered people into paying to be beta testers. There’s a difference between beta testing a game and paying for a playable prerelease


So you're blaming Larian, even though they constantly and very loudly stated that this is nowhere near complete, is buggy, and laggy, and will have crashes, and is far from a finished product, made the decision to buy it anyway, and are complaining and trying to shame the company who very clearly stated that your entire issue with the game is exactly what they told everyone, but it's their fault?

Seems legit. xD

Eddiar #717599 26/10/20 03:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2020
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by Eddiar
Can we stop feeding the little juvenile troll?

Thanks.

I agree with Eddiar; I mean look at OPs name... Clearly an edgelord that just wants attention.

Joined: Oct 2020
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by PMSbloodrage
Unpolished Turd.



Tautological: needless repetition of an idea, especially in words other than those of the immediate context, without imparting additional force or clearness, as in “widow woman.”


What is the problem you are solving? Does your proposed change solve the problem? Is your change feasible? What else will be affected by your change? Will your change impact revenue? Does your change align with the goals and strategies of the organizations (Larian, WotC)?
Joined: Oct 2020
J
stranger
Offline
stranger
J
Joined: Oct 2020
Fitting nickname.

Joined: Mar 2020
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Mar 2020
You paid, now you can complain as much as you want we have your money


Larian's Biggest Oversight, what to do about it, and My personal review of BG3 EA
"74.85% of you stood with the Tieflings, and 25.15% of you sided with Minthara. Good outweighs evil, it seems."
Joined: Oct 2020
S
Banned
Offline
Banned
S
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by PMSbloodrage
Early access should at least be playable without all of the bugs and problems that players are seeing. A “prerelease” should be a playable game with minor bugs.
Essentially what larian did was release a shell and suckered people into paying to be beta testers. There’s a difference between beta testing a game and paying for a playable prerelease


You just misunderstand what "Early access" is.

Its not a "pre-release" or any kind of "get the game before other people". Despite the name being misleading to those who dont know, and never bothered to read about it, this is a beta - released as as such only under a different term for purposes of marketing - in order to get some money and early public reactions - which are then more or less incorporated into the further development. The bugs, the glitches, various missing dialogues or cobbled quests, the lack of full optimization - thats all a part of the "early access" - which is basically a public beta.

Once the game is actually complete you will get the full game without spending another dollar or euro on it.
Thats what you bought too.

This right now is a stage of polishing. And the feedback they get from many players is helping polishing it and changing it and improving it.
The players in turn get an early, unpolished but representative experience to see what the studio intends for the game, its story, mechanics and so on.

Your silly complaints only mean you never bothered to check what the early access really is, because it felt better to you to just imagine its some kind of "early demo - release". It isnt, nobody ever said it is and Steam and Valve made sure to explain all that very clearly so they are covered from any accusations like yours.

Now you know. So you can stop being ridiculous.



Last edited by Surface R; 26/10/20 03:56 PM.
Joined: Oct 2020
member
Offline
member
Joined: Oct 2020
Textbook Karen, I guess.

Gotta love misinformed entitled consumers.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5