Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2020
G
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
G
Joined: Oct 2020
Final post, and then I’ll let y’all get back to the dogpile 😂

I’m not offended, thx! Nor (obviously) do I have a problem with murderous goblins, M rated games, or the existence of fictional vampires. These all seem like straw-man arguments to me tbh, but let’s pretend they’re real.

Mostly it matters because he’s a companion. I kick him out or kill him and I’m down a rogue, y’all! I think it’s a better game if you have access to all your peeps.

Another difference is in the intent of the scene. After I kicked Astarion out, Gith Lady suggested that I view what happened as equivalent to the other characters’ dark secrets. She was referring to his vampirism, which I could care less about. I didn’t kick dude out for being a vampire, I kicked him out for climbing on me in my sleep, which seems like a normal human reaction the writing didn’t account for.

If the intent of the scene was to force a possible confrontation, and the writers knew they were potentially squicking people out and felt it was worth it, that’s their business. In that case, I would agree that this game isn’t for me and bow out.

But I don’t think the writers took that into account. You could argue that they wouldn’t care about my reaction here, and there’s a 90% chance you’re right! But I see the potential for improvement, and I know for absolute sure that, passionate defenses of goblin atrocities aside, this is exactly the forum to raise such concerns.

How do I know? Because the creators literally asked for it 😂

How you draw a connection between any of this and censorship is beyond me, folks, but the internet is a wild place. Enjoy it!

Last edited by gabbyquail; 14/10/20 07:05 PM.
Joined: Oct 2020
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by LizNuzz
Originally Posted by Eddiar
Originally Posted by gabbyquail
How is describing my reaction to a scene reaching? It’s my experience. Providing feedback is what playtesters do.


The game allows you to kill him for his transgression.
The game is also rated mature and I don't understand why you want to censor this component of the game.

The game also includes, cannibalism, slavery and child murder...
None of them are very nice things and as the player you could do something about it.

So why are you unsatisfied?


To be fair, I don't think most people (in western countries/ main target group of the game) have a lot of personal experience with cannibalism, slavery, or getting their children killed. Being raped is more common for a female in our society than most people seem to think. If most people were traumatized by war these days, it's likely game developers wouldn't mainly make war ( or other serious fighting) games, because many people wouldn't want to play it. So I don't see the problem in giving feedback to game developers that rape isn't part of an enjoyable game for an audience (that may or may not be larger than you think. After all, if nobody is allowed to complain about it, how are others supposed to express their discomfort?) It's not like OP demanded in a rant they have to change it. I think they were giving pretty neutral feedback, given this is a topic that seems to seriously disturb them.

The point about the maturity rating: This rating merely indicates sex is part of the game. Maturity content is not the same as violent mature content, and therefore the rating isn't exactly telling you if it's content you feel safe with or not.



The problem isn't how many people it offends or not and how many people get triggered by slavery (which I remind you is still very much alive in America).

The problem is just all the nitty gritty stuff including this are optional.
You can punish the offending character and even stop them before they even have a chance.

The game is no forcing you down any road which is amazing.
If it was I would agree with OP but it isn't and it isn't glorifying it.

Giving feedback is fine but lets be consistent and fair.
If you want to be technical about it then this is a biased and inaccurate feedback so the community is calling it out.

Last edited by Eddiar; 14/10/20 06:54 PM.
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Italy
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Italy
Originally Posted by Godfrid
You have the option to throw him out of the party or kill him. Get over it, or don't play the game. This is a game, a narrative art. You are not forced to play it. You don't go around protesting that Romeo and Juliet should be prohibited due to suicide triggers, you just simply should avoid it.
I personally like the NPC because he is a creep, and it is interesting. Interesting to interact with it, to kill him, to throw him out, or even to get to know him. As I presume he will turn at to be a character with more layers. He is a slave to his master, an undead after who knows how many years of suffering and abuse. I can't wait to see his struggle with his nature, his two fold curse. I presume there might be interesting character development on his part during the game. Scratching that because you find it disturbing is not a solution, because with that attitude we could burn all games, movies, books and really any piece of art. If you can't cope with it you should either avoid it or look for professional help, because the purpose of art is to trigger emotions, to make you think... If you can't cope with such a small thing it is not healthy and avoiding it and ignoring it might be a temporary solution for you, but trying to force your avoidance on others definitely not the way.

+100000000

Joined: Jun 2014
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jun 2014
Originally Posted by gabbyquail
Final post, and then I’ll let y’all get back to the dogpile 😂

I’m not offended, thx! Nor (obviously) do I have a problem with murderous goblins, M rated games, or the existence of fictional vampires. These all seem like straw-man arguments to me tbh, but let’s pretend they’re real.

The difference is in the intent of the scene. After I kicked Astarion out, Gith Lady suggested that I view what happened as equivalent to the other characters’ dark secrets. She was referring to his vampirism, which I could care less about. I didn’t kick dude out for being a vampire, I kicked him out for climbing on me in my sleep, which seems like a normal human reaction the writing didn’t account for.

If the intent of the scene was to force a possible confrontation, and the writers knew they were potentially squicking people out and felt it was worth it, that’s their business. In that case, I would agree that this game isn’t for me and bow out.

But I don’t think the writers took that into account. You could argue that they wouldn’t care about my reaction here, and there’s a 90% chance you’re right! But I see the potential for improvement, and I know for absolute sure that, passionate defenses of goblin atrocities aside, this is exactly the forum to raise such concerns.

How do I know? Because the creators literally asked for it 😂

How you draw a connection between any of this and censorship is beyond me, folks, but the internet is a wild place. Enjoy it!


I meanm you created said dogpile, so it's kind of your fault, isn't it?

Joined: Oct 2020
H
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
H
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by LizNuzz
Originally Posted by Eddiar
Originally Posted by gabbyquail
How is describing my reaction to a scene reaching? It’s my experience. Providing feedback is what playtesters do.


The game allows you to kill him for his transgression.
The game is also rated mature and I don't understand why you want to censor this component of the game.

The game also includes, cannibalism, slavery and child murder...
None of them are very nice things and as the player you could do something about it.

So why are you unsatisfied?


To be fair, I don't think most people (in western countries/ main target group of the game) have a lot of personal experience with cannibalism, slavery, or getting their children killed. Being raped is more common for a female in our society than most people seem to think. If most people were traumatized by war these days, it's likely game developers wouldn't mainly make war ( or other serious fighting) games, because many people wouldn't want to play it. So I don't see the problem in giving feedback to game developers that rape isn't part of an enjoyable game for an audience (that may or may not be larger than you think. After all, if nobody is allowed to complain about it, how are others supposed to express their discomfort?) It's not like OP demanded in a rant they have to change it. I think they were giving pretty neutral feedback, given this is a topic that seems to seriously disturb them.

The point about the maturity rating: This rating merely indicates sex is part of the game. Maturity content is not the same as violent mature content, and therefore the rating isn't exactly telling you if it's content you feel safe with or not.


This is not rape. This is bloodsucking. Do you feel raped when a syringe take your blood for a medical exam?


If it's what it's takes to save the world, then the world doesn't deserves to be saved - Geralt
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Netherlands
member
Offline
member
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Netherlands
Censoring the game because someone gets triggered is going too far. Different people get triggered by different things, If those things were all removed there wouldn't be a game left. Add an additional warning if you must, but it's already there with the M rating.

Joined: Sep 2017
member
Offline
member
Joined: Sep 2017
The scene definitely needs some work, similarly to his introduction scene.

While I only viewed it once, I do recall being disappointed with the lack of dialog options to essentially tell him off. The crux of the issue was the lack of consent, which I could not expressly address, and did not receive an apology for or even an acknowledgment from Astarion.

Joined: Oct 2020
H
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
H
Joined: Oct 2020
Why should he apology or acknowledge anything? he is not bound to your main party member by anything but a mutual objective. remember : he tried to kill you in your first encounter, and didn't apology either. Its just the character writing. he doesn't give a damn about you. he doesn't care about the feeling of your main character.

Its just his personnality, the way he is written. See it from a role playing point of view and don't get offended by minor slight like that. If you're still dissatisfied by his behavior, you can still kill him.

I feel like you take everything too personally . Its just a selfish, evil character in a video game.

Last edited by Hachina; 14/10/20 08:11 PM.

If it's what it's takes to save the world, then the world doesn't deserves to be saved - Geralt
Joined: Aug 2015
S
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
S
Joined: Aug 2015
Originally Posted by Godfrid
You have the option to throw him out of the party or kill him. Get over it, or don't play the game. This is a game, a narrative art. You are not forced to play it. You don't go around protesting that Romeo and Juliet should be prohibited due to suicide triggers, you just simply should avoid it.
I personally like the NPC because he is a creep, and it is interesting. Interesting to interact with it, to kill him, to throw him out, or even to get to know him. As I presume he will turn at to be a character with more layers. He is a slave to his master, an undead after who knows how many years of suffering and abuse. I can't wait to see his struggle with his nature, his two fold curse. I presume there might be interesting character development on his part during the game. Scratching that because you find it disturbing is not a solution, because with that attitude we could burn all games, movies, books and really any piece of art. If you can't cope with it you should either avoid it or look for professional help, because the purpose of art is to trigger emotions, to make you think... If you can't cope with such a small thing it is not healthy and avoiding it and ignoring it might be a temporary solution for you, but trying to force your avoidance on others definitely not the way.


QFT! 100% this.

Joined: Oct 2020
T
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
T
Joined: Oct 2020
[/quote]

I meanm you created said dogpile, so it's kind of your fault, isn't it?
[/quote]

This. Exactly this.

Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Sweden
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Oct 2020
Location: Sweden
I don't remember exactly his position in the scene but if he climbs on top of the pc to bite him/her, that can easily be changed to him reaching for the neck, sitting beside the pc. Such a simple reanimation wouldn't change the narrative but would lessen the trigger for some victims of sexual assault/rape. Which, btw, is an horrible experience and is not something that should EVER be taken lightly on or trivialized, fantasy video game or not.

OP simply gave his/her feedback on a part of the game that didn't feel right. Just like people are discussing other topics that can feel nit picky but that is important to those that raise their voices about those topics.

It's completely unnecessary to call OP a troll or devalue his/her opinion in this matter.

Ofc everyone that liked the scene can argue for it staying as it is but be civilized people. Show that you guys and girls actually learned something from Me too. As someone stated, the game is rated M- for mature. So let's be just that.

Joined: Sep 2020
Banned
Offline
Banned
Joined: Sep 2020
I just kill Astarion on sight now. I can't stand his character.

Joined: Oct 2020
D
old hand
Offline
old hand
D
Joined: Oct 2020
The option to kill him or boot him out of the party is right there. A vampire doing vampire things seem to be pretty spot on target imo.

Joined: Sep 2017
member
Offline
member
Joined: Sep 2017
Originally Posted by Hachina
Why should he apology or acknowledge anything? he is not bound to your main party member by anything but a mutual objective. remember : he tried to kill you in your first encounter, and didn't apology either. Its just the character writing. he doesn't give a damn about you. he doesn't care about the feeling of your main character.

Its just his personnality, the way he is written. See it from a role playing point of view and don't get offended by minor slight like that. If you're still dissatisfied by his behavior, you can still kill him.

I feel like you take everything too personally . Its just a selfish, evil character in a video game.


He's definitely a pompous ass who excuses everything he does. One easy way to get him to apologize for his behavior is to agree to let him suck your blood if he apologizes to you. And when he inevitably scoffs at your request and does a half-assed apology complete with an eye roll, another dialog choice should pop up that allows me to pick, "I need you to mean it." I think it's a great way to still show off his personalty, but also evens the playing field a little bit. They can even go the extra mile and have his responses based on his current approval rating. If he hates your guts he can storm off and get blood elsewhere.

Joined: Oct 2020
S
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
S
Joined: Oct 2020
Originally Posted by KillerRabbit
I think the OP makes a good point -- I would support some sort of warning and an option to remove Astarian from the game. I had no desire to have the vampire from SoD/BG2EE in my game, period, and there was a (very hard to find) way to ensure that character never showed up.

I haven't had the experiences that the OP has and so I react differently. I want Astarian in my party but I also want to give players options and warnings.

I read the boar as exactly that; he's shifty, and if you pass dice rolls you work out it's been drained of it's blood by two puncture wounds in the next. Pair that with the fact this elf obviously doesn't look like a normal elf, and I saw the midnight snack scene coming like a train with it's horn blaring. If it's not hard coded to be before the midnight snack, it should be to clue players in. It can be tweaked, so he approaches and asks, but that both loses the drama of the scene and (from what I've seen of him in action) undermines Astarian's character.
To say nothing of the character splash on the sight, the live demo earlier this year where sven played as him and the origin option players will be able to click on and read about him.

I'm regret it upsets you and OP, however I'm not sorry this scene plays how it does. The game is rated mature, there are clues to his nature, and as others have said, you can immediately punish him for his attempt. The next time you start the game from the beginning you can 'forget' to recruit him too.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5