Originally Posted by Wormerine
Originally Posted by kanisatha
My point simply is that one cannot say WotC/Larian's decision to use that name is a neutral or arbitrary decision. It is indisputably a *calculated* decision meant to help sell the game to a wider audience than they would get if they did not use that name. That's all I'm saying.

Or perhaps WotC/Larian and some long time fans simply disagree what BG3 could and should look like. How game makers perceive an IP and how players perceive it might be fundamentally different.

Both of these can be true (and I believe they are).

As to the main topic, though (aren't there numerous old threads on the same subject?), I am fine with four.