Originally Posted by Bruh
Originally Posted by Ianthebea
Originally Posted by Firesnakearies
Originally Posted by alice_ashpool
every time I read a thread like this I remember that video games were a mistake

As always, hitting the nail on the head.

this is true, this thread has been a wild ride of incel vibes and alt right getting pissed off at 'LGBTQ things getting pushed into my video games'

all they've done is not added exclusion flags for certain race/sex combinations and some of these folks have been losing their marbles over it.

the realm of D&D and fae'rûn have been legendarily horny whenever a PC during any campaign wants to start a romance arc with an NPC and the amount of succubi/incubi type monsters in the manual like nymphs etc so all of this has been incredibly on brand so far as far as I'm concerned

But I'm LGBT and I don't want unrestricted romances either. Also I'm sorry, but I have to ask: Isn't it the most incel thing in the world to make demands about how all companions should have the hots for you no matter what? I would think that incels don't get any ction IRL, taht's why they want everything to be omnisexual ingame. Correct me if I'm wrong, but sexual entitlement like that sounds very much like what an incel would have.

it's obvious you don't know any incels dude, plenty of them thanks to their own traumas won't be able to connect or even feel much during a sexual encounter, a lot of actual incels are bordering on suicide with genuine chronic touch deprivation, you can see their genuine distaste for sexuality and an almost puritanical christian attitude towards sexual promiscuity (the same sexual promiscuity that a lot of people in this thread seem to be getting upset over) as signs that they of all people would probably advocate for their strict and pure definitions of love and romance IE the exact opposite of what you just said