From what I have gathered it took Wizards of the Coast some 4-5 decades to figure out that it might be a good idea to constrain the ridiculous nonlinearities of their retarded ruleset with bandaids like "bounded accuracy".
And some people here treat D&D rules like they were some godsent commandments L O L
I'm not following.
Would you play chess with checkers ru!es? Why would you play D&D 5e with another ruleset?
All people are trying to suggest is make the game more like 5e which it is based on, not because it's the greatest system ever.
Early versions of chess were quite different from modern chess, afaik. BG3 is in alpha stage and everything is subject to change. I would rather put my faith in Larian to create a good ruleset for a videogame rather than a company that needed half a century to figure out something like "bounded accuracy". The reason BG1&2 were good is certainly not the D&D rules.
