Larian Studios Forums Baldur's Gate III Baldur's Gate III - General Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous vs BG3

That's the first time I've seen that Disco Elysium video, and I am now reminded that I bought it nearly two years ago but never got around to playing it, even if I already recognize how genius that game's writing is. That talk at the beginning as I am watching the video about the position of dialogue boxes is actually really fascinating, and I agree that it's a far better approach.

I wonder how much Disco Elysium has sold? I know it got a huge boost out of winning the most awards at the VGAs two years ago.

Found this post.... responding to this now. I am curious. Pathfinder makers Owlcat said they would make Pathfinder 2 more easy from the ruthless challenge of Pathfinder 1. Well if nothing else then that make more settings you can change in settings to make it more easy. Personally I would dump somatic component (you need hand free for spellcasting) immediately at least in Solasta I got really annoyed by it. In real pen and paper a GM either understand in less then 3 seconds if I say I drop item and cast spell and many friendly GM do also ignore the somatic component rule in Pen and Paper Dnd sessions.

However I dislike a solution if you are forced to make challenge more easy from table top rules example enemies less hitpoints etc.
Well my question for Pathfinder 2 players since I have not played it is this:
Do you think the rules that are most close to real Dnd Rules are to tough challenge in Pathfinder 2 (well lets say you can ignore somatic component rule but everyhting else as in DnD Pathfinder)?

I am not talking about if you take most easy challenge level or most hard challenge level.
Well and is Pathfinder 2 any more easy then Pathfinder 1 in challenge combat?

I know that many player can say what is this I played through Pathfinder 1 no problem. Pathfinder 1 got much criticism due to a bit unpolished (bugs) and then to hard challenge level.