|
|
Re: Divinity needs to learn from BG3 Romance Problems
Halycon Styxland
32 minutes ago
You cant kill Gale.
You can leave him to his doom when you first meet him. But thats the last chance you get to kill him.
I mean OK, you can get him to -50 approval, attack the grove, etc. So you can get rid of him.
Cant kill him, though. You can also tell him to leave after he reveals his "condition" right ? I never chose that option, but I assumed that he would leave if you told him to. Thats was one of the "etc".
37
8,274
Read More
|
|
Re: Abdel, who?
Halycon Styxland
37 minutes ago
Btw I'm not aware that you have to do anything before freeing Halsin.
AFAIK what you have to do is to stop the kids from ringing the alarm, because then the whole camp would be alarmed. Oh and you have to tell Halsin to stand down, or send him to camp. If he joins you in his bear form, well theres only combat after that. Halsin helps, but doesnt help THAT much, so if you didnt do anything else at this point, expect a huge battle.
30
2,303
Read More
|
|
Re: AI controversy in games
EinTroll
Yesterday at 05:07 PM
It's only being called "AI" because it tricks people (Notably, investors) into thinking it's actual AI, but it's not.
This isn't bad in of itself (Outside the economic concerns of this investor hype, with it massively impacting prices of computer components and causing lots of Data Centres to get built which suck up all the water and use tons of electricity)
The main controversy surrounding "AI" comes from the way that the current fad iterations function. Which is by training a dataset to regurgitate to users. And this exactly is what I keep trying to tell anyone that listens. It's not the technology evolving, as it never is. It's the horribly delayed and long-term lack of regulation. IMHO, technological progress should be treated something like cyber security. As soon as some new vulnerability is identified, it's a race to fix it up before too many bad actors exploit it. Replace "vulnerability" with "technology", "fix it up" with "regulate it" and that is the principle I would personally *love* to become internationally-spaning law.
9
3,654
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
